Repository navigation
docs: explain casing primarily as a parser simplification - #217
Conversation
Make ambiguity prevention the primary rationale and readability a secondary benefit. Reduce its prominence in the foundations without changing identifier rules.
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configuration
You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe specification and stories now describe initial identifier casing as a parsing aid that distinguishes type names from value names, including the overlap between type expressions and comparisons. Foundations descriptions remove casing as a semantic commitment and separate it from staged types and strictness. ChangesIdentifier casing documentation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR clarifies documentation without changing executable rules. The reviewed grammar supports the casing distinction, so no actionable merge-blocking risk remains. Architecture SummaryArchitecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change affects 3 systems. Changed systems: Architecture concerns Review detailsSystems and components
Before / after behavior
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request reframes the 'casing determines kind' rule from a core semantic foundation of the language to a practical surface grammar and parsing decision, updating the specification and story documents accordingly. The feedback recommends using British spelling ('organising' instead of 'organizing') in stories/lexical.md to ensure consistency with the rest of the repository.
The documentation overstates identifier casing as a central language foundation. Explain its primary purpose as simplifying parsing and preventing possible ambiguities by enforcing the intended PascalCase/camelCase convention; present readability as a secondary benefit.
Reduce casing's prominence in the foundations overview and README, and correct the design rationale in the foundations and lexical stories. Identifier rules and language semantics are unchanged.
Validation:
npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 '**/*.md'passed for all 40 Markdown files;git diff --checkpassed.Summary by CodeRabbit