Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR removes
@kim-emfrom the catch-all*rule and keeps that name only on/.github/workflows/.The
*rule asks all six owners for a review on every pull request, whatever it touches. That had accumulated 47 open requests, of which the only ones genuinely needing this reviewer were two recent changes to the nightly bump pipeline. Scoping to the workflows directory keeps those and drops the rest.The workflows rule repeats the other five owners because CODEOWNERS applies only the last matching rule, so naming one person there would have quietly removed everyone else from workflow pull requests.
Since
maincarries no code-owner approval requirement, these rules only drive review requests, so this changes who is notified and nothing about how a pull request merges.🤖 Prepared with Claude Code