docs(sdd): archive decision-revision-detector — merge delta specs, accept ADR-0025 (#1014) - #1070
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…nsupported MVP claim (#1014)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Archives the
decision-revision-detectorchange. All 191 tasks are checked; Phase B shipped in #1055, #1058–#1061, #1063 and #1065–#1069.forget-command: "Deletion Sweep Includes Persisted Findings" modified.reconcile-command: "Revision Findings Walk" added.decision-revision-detection: a new domain of 16 requirements, written in main-spec shape (# … Specification/## Purpose/## Requirements), not as a copied delta.git mvtoopenspec/changes/archive/2026-09-29-decision-revision-detector/, includingexploration.md, plus a newarchive-report.md.archive-report.mdand in the archiveddesign.md(Decision 8): the two extrarevisionsstdout lines the design sketched (workspace root; served/judged summary) were never tasked or specified, so they were not built.A follow-up commit rewrites the new spec's Purpose paragraph. The archive agent had written "Part of MVP 3", which
docs/roadmap.mddoes not support, and the paragraph omitted REAFFIRMS and where the vectors come from.Related issue
Refs #1014
Type of change
docs— documentation onlyHow was this tested?
grep -nE '^## (ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED)|Delta for' openspec/specs/*/spec.mdis empty.grep -cxF).ruff check .,ruff format --check .andmypy .are clean;pytest --cov6904 passed, 2 skipped (96.96%), including the ADR status-sync tests.Checklist
ruff,mypy,pytest).