Repository navigation
Add idempotency references with draft backend details - #122
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Add accepted Idempotency keys and Client usage — Angular topics, plus a backend overview and four implementation references explicitly kept as drafts. Include local diagrams, related-topic links and catalog expectation updates. Refs #121
8 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a visual Idempotency keys reference for recognizing one intended creation across retries, with Angular client usage and focused backend implementation references. Related-topic links connect it to HTTP retries and message processing.
Editorial disposition for this delivery:
Validation:
npm run checkpassed on the exact isolated commit candidate: 57 application tests, 119 tooling tests and 38 browser tests, plus formatting, lint, tool types and builds.Codex assisted with content, diagrams and catalog expectation updates; Gabriel reviewed the accepted topics and explicitly selected the draft delivery scope. Unrelated local SQL/database edits are excluded.
Closes #121