Skip to content

Refactor/perf batch 10 - #713

Merged
StuartWheater merged 2 commits into
datashield:refactor/perf-batch-10from
StuartWheater:refactor/perf-batch-10
Sep 25, 2026
Merged

StuartWheater merged 2 commits into
datashield:refactor/perf-batch-10from
StuartWheater:refactor/perf-batch-10

Conversation

@StuartWheater

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@StuartWheater
StuartWheater merged commit e6a5e94 into datashield:refactor/perf-batch-10 Sep 25, 2026
15 of 20 checks passed
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.83%. Comparing base (5cf2979) to head (a529d76).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on refactor/perf-batch-10.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##           refactor/perf-batch-10     #713   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                   66.83%   66.83%           
=======================================================
  Files                         142      142           
  Lines                        5813     5813           
=======================================================
  Hits                         3885     3885           
  Misses                       1928     1928           
Flag Coverage Δ
armadillo-arg 21.02% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-misc 15.60% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-perf-1 5.78% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-perf-2 17.18% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-perf-3 15.99% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-smk-1 34.28% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-smk-2 37.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants