Added tests for query predicates - #3349
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ec3b69e119
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| const operands: PredicateStep[] = validArguments[operator.name].map((arg) => | ||
| typeof arg === "string" ? { type: "string", value: arg } : arg, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Format the predicate operands mapping
Running the repository-required pnpm run lint on this commit fails in lint:fmt, with oxfmt --check identifying this mapping as incorrectly formatted. Apply the formatter’s expected callback layout so the commit can pass the mandatory lint check.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L17-L20
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
No description provided.