Skip to content
blaquebauxPublic

About

The liability-driven book capstone (pension/insurer). KEEPER on the funded-ratio mandate: +5.9%/yr surplus over the liability at funded-ratio drawdown -22% vs a naive 60/40's -37%, positive skew, crisis-convex. LDI hedge + spread carry + plain-equity growth + convex tail. Gives up absolute return for the plan. [Capstone]

Resources

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

backstop

The liability-driven book capstone — pension / insurer mandate.

You owe long-dated liabilities; the job is to backstop them — earn surplus over the liability while keeping the funded ratio from lurching. This assembles the family's liability ingredients into one book and judges it on funded-ratio terms (surplus vol, funded-ratio drawdown vs a long-duration liability), not raw return:

  • LDI hedge (binnacle) — long duration to track the liability
  • spread carry (bedrock) — credit for surplus return
  • growth leg — plain equity, because banyan showed the endowment replica is dominated
  • convex tail (contextual_rescue) — long-vol so the surplus survives the spread blowout

Book: SPY 30 · LQD 25 · TLT 25 · GLD 10 · VIXM 10. Liability proxy = TLT. Alpaca SIP daily.

Verdict

KEEPER (liability mandate). backstop earns a positive surplus over the liability at a far smaller funded-ratio drawdown than a naive 60/40, with positive skew and crisis convexity. It does the mandate's actual job — fund the obligations without betting the funded ratio on rates — and it gives up absolute return to do it, which is the right trade for a plan.

Funded-ratio (the mandate's scorecard, vs a TLT liability):

book surplus ret surplus vol funded-ratio maxDD
BACKSTOP +5.9% +10.9% −22%
naive 60/40 +9.7% +17.4% −37%
pure LDI (all TLT) 0.0% 0.0% 0%
return-seeking (SPY) +15.4% +24.5% −48%

Absolute terms:

book Sharpe CAGR maxDD skew
BACKSTOP +0.85 +6.0% −21% +0.16
naive 60/40 +0.93 +9.7% −21% −0.24
SPY +0.88 +15.0% −34% −0.35

2016-01 … 2026-07 (10.5y).

  • Positive surplus at controlled funded-ratio risk. backstop beats the liability by +5.9%/yr while cutting the funded-ratio drawdown to −22% (vs −37% for a naive 60/40 and −48% for all-equity). Its surplus efficiency is on par with 60/40, but its funded-ratio drawdown — the thing that makes a plan underfunded — is far shallower, and its skew is positive where 60/40's is negative.
  • Crisis convexity: green in COVID (+3.1%) and the 2025 tariff tantrum (+1.7%), −6.0% in the 2022 rate shock (vs 60/40 −7.4%, pure-LDI −8.2%). The long-vol tail (the rescued null) pays when the surplus would otherwise crater — the lesson from contextual_rescue, applied to a liability book.
  • Pure LDI is flat by construction (0% surplus, 0% funded-ratio drawdown — it is the liability); the point of backstop is to add surplus without reintroducing the funded-ratio swings a return-seeking book carries.

backstop_2

Real actuarial liability cashflows (not a TLT proxy) with key-rate hedging, plus after-tax treatment and realistic rebalancing/tail-layer friction — the honest plan-level build the ETF proxy only approximates.

Reproduce

export ALPACA_KEY_ID=... ALPACA_SECRET_KEY=...
python3 research/backstop_1.py

Capstone family

backstop (liability) joins bulkhead (preservation / FO), belligerent (aggressive / HF), and brawl (doctrine) — same keeper ingredients, different mandates.


Blaque Baux — a Carter Warrens research initiative. Research only; not investment advice. The verdict falls where the data puts it — a plan is judged by its funded ratio, not its return.

About

The liability-driven book capstone (pension/insurer). KEEPER on the funded-ratio mandate: +5.9%/yr surplus over the liability at funded-ratio drawdown -22% vs a naive 60/40's -37%, positive skew, crisis-convex. LDI hedge + spread carry + plain-equity growth + convex tail. Gives up absolute return for the plan. [Capstone]

Resources

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages