Refactor keyword aliases behind a compatibility layer

[cvanelteren]

Continuation of our discussion in #808

UltraPlot has many (many many) aliases. Some love them, some hate them. This PR proposes to move them away from function signatures, to remain with a smaller set, and pushing the rest into a specific decorator. This allows for a smaller function description in stuff like pylance.

I added a small applet in the docs that shows all the aliases, and shows where they can be added etc. Open for feedback!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 97.19388% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
ultraplot/internals/kwargs.py	90.47%	5 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
ultraplot/axes/plot.py	89.28%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[cvanelteren]

@gepcel can you test drive this in case I missed some of the aliases?
Basically if you hit errors because some of the aliases are missing is fine. I think this is relatively thorough tho.

[gepcel]

I tested on some of my snippets, no errors were raised.

[cvanelteren]

What do you think of the applet in the docs(https://ultraplot--818.org.readthedocs.build/en/818/aliases.html) @gepcel?

[gepcel]

Excellent job.

[cvanelteren]

Ok great then we are merging this but we can always return to this commit in case we encounter errors.