Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: eliminate redundant stack allocations in VM instruction tracing - #61

Merged
Tcode-Motion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-stack-tracing-12927681461920627077
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

⚡ Bolt: eliminate redundant stack allocations in VM instruction tracing#61
Tcode-Motion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-stack-tracing-12927681461920627077

Conversation

@Tcode-Motion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced a Vec<RuntimeValue> clone (get_dump()) with a zero-copy slice reference (data_slice()) in the VM's instruction tracing logic.
🎯 Why: Calling self.stack.get_dump() cloned the entire execution stack on every single instruction when debugging or tracing was enabled, causing massive O(N) heap allocation overhead inside the hottest fetch-decode-execute loop of the interpreter.
📊 Impact: Eliminates a major memory allocation bottleneck during VM tracing, significantly reducing memory churn and overhead on the hot execution path when the debugger is enabled.
🔬 Measurement: Verify by running the VM test suite with debugging enabled. Profiling tools should show a complete removal of Vec::clone inside trace_instruction.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12927681461920627077 started by @Tcode-Motion

Added a `data_slice` method to `ValueStack` to provide zero-copy slice access.
Updated the instruction tracer in `executor.rs` to use this slice instead of
cloning the entire stack via `get_dump()` on every instruction execution.

Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@Tcode-Motion
Tcode-Motion marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2026 07:04
@Tcode-Motion
Tcode-Motion merged commit ce06252 into main Sep 7, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant