Persist bilingual candidate advice bound to research material - #639
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current research summary only stores a single Chinese text, leaving the operator UI unable to show matching Chinese and English decision advice. Accept one strictly validated bilingual callback result and persist its candidate-only material binding generated by QPK before the callback runs.
Keep existing saved explanations and legacy text callbacks; missing or invalid bilingual content remains unavailable without retrying. The callback receives an isolated copy and cannot supply binding or authority fields. This does not change human approval, execution permissions or provider routing. AAB and QRS adoption follow separately.
Validation: 205 focused research-cycle tests passed; targeted Ruff and diff checks passed. Independent review passed after restoring an existing admission test assertion to its original test. No real model or cloud calls were made.