-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
feat: parse Q10 archived map packets #936
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hCoureau
wants to merge
4
commits into
Python-roborock:main
Choose a base branch
from
hCoureau:feat/q10-archive-packets
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b8bdf3a
fix: request Q10 maps without starting cleaning
hCoureau 95d268e
feat: parse Q10 archived map packets
hCoureau 1a4ffde
chore: merge main for Q10 archive review fixes
hCoureau cbd6abc
refactor: give Q10 clean-record maps ownership of historical paths
hCoureau File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
when this kind of map packet is received, how many of these other fields are also included?
What i'm wondering is if a historical trace kind has a lot of overlap with other fields in Q10MapPacket or if it needs to be a separate type. basically as more fields are added the map packet seems like a sparse object. You could imagine each kind Q10MapPacketKind has a separate dataclass for example, if the overlap is low.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re-reading the code I don't actually see the historical trace even being used anywhere yet, except in the tests.
Naively, it seems to me like we shouldn't be sticking this on to a map package and instead just using the kind to parse a clean record?