Skip to content

Upgrade Next.js to 16.4.3 (security) - #1

Merged
florianamette merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
security/next-16.4.3
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

florianamette merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
security/next-16.4.3

Conversation

@florianamette

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Next.js 16.3.8 is affected by GHSA-673q-mjm6-r5xr and GHSA-2464-fhr4-w9xw (critical: unauthenticated remote code execution) and GHSA-p3m5-59mp-jv5r (high: denial of service), fixed in 16.4.1 (15.5.28 for 15.x). This moves next (and eslint-config-next / @next/* where they follow it) to 16.4.3 and refreshes the lockfile (pnpm@10). Nothing else changes.

16.3.8 is affected by GHSA-673q-mjm6-r5xr and GHSA-2464-fhr4-w9xw (critical: unauthenticated remote code execution) and GHSA-p3m5-59mp-jv5r (high: denial of service).
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
evtx-parser Ready Ready Preview Nov 2, 2026 7:39pm UTC

Request Review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-02T19:34:28.712666Z f1c6f0b PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f1c6f0b107

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread package.json
"lucide-react": "^1.16.0",
"negotiator": "^1.0.0",
"next": "16.3.8",
"next": "16.4.3",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Update package-lock.json alongside the Next.js version

The checked-in package-lock.json still specifies and resolves both next and eslint-config-next at 16.3.8, while this change requires 16.4.3. Both .github/workflows/ci.yml:17 and the Dockerfile's build stage run npm ci --ignore-scripts, so updating only the pnpm lockfile breaks those installation paths before checks or builds run. The locally installed npm documentation (docs/content/commands/npm-ci.md) explicitly states that when lockfile dependencies do not match package.json, “npm ci will exit with an error, instead of updating the package lock.” Regenerate and commit the npm lockfile for the upgraded versions as well.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@florianamette
florianamette merged commit b573b52 into main Nov 2, 2026
3 checks passed
@florianamette
florianamette deleted the security/next-16.4.3 branch November 2, 2026 19:40
florianamette added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2026
Upgrade Next.js to 16.4.3 (security)
florianamette added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2026
Upgrade Next.js to 16.4.3 (security)

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 3c52f5c5 Deployed Nov 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant