Skip to content

fix: add Hoodeth ERC20 operation hash prefixes - #9704

Draft
ralph-bitgo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
SPT-445-hoodeth-vrt-transfer
Draft

fix: add Hoodeth ERC20 operation hash prefixes#9704
ralph-bitgo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
SPT-445-hoodeth-vrt-transfer

Conversation

@ralph-bitgo

@ralph-bitgo ralph-bitgo Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

WHAT

Configure chain-specific ERC20 operation hash prefixes for Hoodeth mainnet and testnet.

WHY

EthLikeToken signing uses the network prefix for token operation hashes. Hoodeth networks previously omitted it, causing wallet token sends to use the generic fallback rather than explicit chain-specific ERC20 prefixes.

Ticket: SPT-445

@ralph-bitgo
ralph-bitgo Bot force-pushed the SPT-445-hoodeth-vrt-transfer branch from 45047bf to b1ec5bb Compare September 10, 2026 08:51
WHAT: Configure chain-specific ERC20 operation hash prefixes for Hoodeth mainnet and testnet.\n\nWHY: EthLikeToken signing uses the network prefix for token operation hashes; Hoodeth networks previously omitted it, causing wallet token sends to use an inconsistent generic fallback.

Ticket: SPT-445
Session-Id: 7e1eab36-9635-413e-a503-6c4eeff422db
Task-Id: ea069a0e-c9f9-4d16-8a15-a1c84c0f165f
@ralph-bitgo
ralph-bitgo Bot force-pushed the SPT-445-hoodeth-vrt-transfer branch 2 times, most recently from 9d60d48 to 1a70f24 Compare September 10, 2026 08:52
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ Unit tests are failing on Node 26.x (Current release line, non-blocking). This is not an LTS version yet, so it does not block merge, but it signals an incompatibility to fix before Node 26.x becomes LTS.

View run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants