Skip to content

Overhaul verifier operator workflow - #191

Merged
AdamSpitz merged 2 commits into
devfrom
chore/verifier-operator-overhaul
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

AdamSpitz merged 2 commits into
devfrom
chore/verifier-operator-overhaul

Conversation

@AdamSpitz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Land the local verifier operator overhaul: menu/operator scripts, operator policy check, views/freshness/cost presentation.

Cherry-picked from a diverged misc branch onto current dev.

Test plan

  • node --test scripts/lib/verifier-operator.test.mjs
  • Operator docs in verifier/README.md / verifier/OPERATOR-OVERHAUL.md

@AdamSpitz AdamSpitz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review receipt.

Verifier operator overhaul cherry-picked onto current dev. Operator CLI, policy check, views/freshness presentation. Tests in scripts/lib/verifier-operator.test.mjs. No blocking findings.

Reviewed-with: grok
Reviewed-files: 24
Reviewed-commit: fba69b7

Project the evidence DAG into current-work, stand, milestone, and all-checks views, and surface stale vs current verdicts separately from rerun cost.
@AdamSpitz
AdamSpitz force-pushed the chore/verifier-operator-overhaul branch from fba69b7 to ec58f22 Compare September 15, 2026 21:10

@AdamSpitz AdamSpitz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review receipt.

Re-review after rebase onto origin/dev (PR #190 landed). Verifier operator overhaul; no blocking findings.

Reviewed-with: grok
Reviewed-files: 24
Reviewed-commit: ec58f22

@AdamSpitz
AdamSpitz merged commit 98f0127 into dev Sep 15, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant