I’ve submitted this through http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html, but track it here since it affects this repository.
Both http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/#Categories as the latest draft of that document i.e. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/proposed.html#Categories list the following example:
\p{General_Category = Not_Assigned}
However, Not_Assigned is not a valid General_Category name as per the table here: http://unicode.org/reports/tr44/#GC_Values_Table
Suggested fix: use Unassigned instead in the example.
\p{General_Category = Unassigned}
It would be easy enough to add a Not_Assigned alias but I’d rather not if this is indeed a mistake.
I’ve submitted this through http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html, but track it here since it affects this repository.
Both http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/#Categories as the latest draft of that document i.e. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/proposed.html#Categories list the following example:
However,
Not_Assignedis not a validGeneral_Categoryname as per the table here: http://unicode.org/reports/tr44/#GC_Values_TableSuggested fix: use
Unassignedinstead in the example.It would be easy enough to add a
Not_Assignedalias but I’d rather not if this is indeed a mistake.